The Washington-based Entertainment Software Association noted last year that the average age of a video game player is 30 and that the average age of a video game purchaser is 36. Parents are involved in the purchase of games 83 percent of the time, the association said.
It's time for a little reality check. First kids aren't really the ones buying these games most of the time. Second, while giving a kid these games is probably not a very responsible thing to do, and may put some bad ideas in his/her head, video games are probably not the only place many District kids witness drug use or violence. How about we deal with those issues rather than grand-standing over symbolic actions? Besides, even if this law does reduce in store sales of violent games to minors, the Council may find it a bit difficult to keep such games entirely out of the hands of minors when it is extremely easy to just download them on the internet (and burn them to CD, to pass onto friends), or to buy them off e-bay. No, no , clearly I'm wrong. It's a much better idea to introduce redundant legislation so we can pretend we're doing something to help kids and fight crime.
I don't have a problem with this legislation. I just hope we don't let surface rule over substance.
1 comment:
classic knee-jerk legislation. just like when PG county banned trench coats after columbine...
Post a Comment