Monday, November 24, 2008

DCmud: Arboretum Place

DCmud gets a slight update on Arboretum Place. Too bad the author's an ignorant ass.

14 comments:

Alan Page said...

will the trend of snarky asides in blogging ever die?

Tom A. said...

Well, I enjoy a good blogsnark from time to time.

Hmm did I just coin a phrase? I want credit!

Anonymous said...

perhaps its best if DC muds readership believes that there is nothing interesting on h.

Alan Page said...

i didn't mind the snarky aside from elise, i minded the series of snarky asides from dcmud

Hillman said...

This is indeed good news, if it actually does make it into development.

Let's get beyond the snark and do what we can to encourage this development.

Unknown said...

Perhpas I am missing why DC Author is an ass. I am not part of this crowd really, for a multitude of reasons. I liked the article. I am concerned about H Street creep , meaning 1600 Maryland Avenue NE was never part of H Street. H Street Needs work, and isn't the only business district around. It's still not quite ready for prime time. There are places that will have to go like the carry-outs and the crappy looking stores. Some small businesses will also fail, it's life or rather business.

Arboretum Place offers the Carver and & Trinidad areas a chance to shine, and will hopefully spur development along the much blighted bladensburg road.

Again, I may be missing something, as I am not part of this crowd.

Anonymous said...

yeah, the author of the article was not being PC, because he doesn't live amongst us.

i knock the burbs all the time.

because they could be better.

DCMud are professionals.

they call it as they see it.

what's wrong with that?

should they have said, "WOW, h street just keeps getting better! it's such an amazing neighborhood! it's better than u street, and even georgetown! OMG, another development?!?! AMAZING! that corridor is, like, so cool!"

not yet, children.

critics still have a roll to play, whether you want to believe it or not.

R.E.A.L.I.T.Y. check.

thanks in advance....

inked said...

The author [Hunter] was being cheeky. He tried to justify his cheekiness with facts that weren't actually true. If you call yourself a journalist [which Hunter does in his profile] you are really supposed to verify that kind of thing. So yeah, he was being an ass.

Anonymous said...

fair enough, inked.

i agree that he was being an ass, but i got his point.

we've come a long way, but there's still a lot more to be done.

and yeah, aside from the bars and clubs, there needs to be some substantive development in the area. yesterday, i rode around u street. there are TONS of developments in the area - not just bars and clubs.

it's all about sustainability and destination. i'll echo the only point that i felt totally comfortable with: the development is welcome.

his arsehole comments flew by me, cuz i'm an arsehole myself.

but if you see through his crap, he has a valid point.

Unknown said...

Wow, so you say that he's an ass because according to you he got his facts wrong. Maybe he was mistaken, maybe he's not even wrong. But to resort to petty name calling just because... well that makes me ask who's the real ass.

Try not to be Joan of Arc. H Street is not the kingdom of heaven. It's not something you need to take risks to protect. It's a slightly run down commercial strip in the process of perhaps coming back in to commercial success. The city has a few of them, the Region has many more.


And this by all accounts was an editorial piece. I know we blur the lines, but journalist don't give an opinion one way or another. And it's silly to call the writer of an opinion piece a derogatory names. In fact that act show a extreme level of unsophistication and immaturity more typical of a elementary schoolyard.

Opinion pieces are reserved for less disciplined and less trained people like bloggers, columnists, and anyone else with an a-hole.

Sorry to kill the high horse, but I guess someone needs to be the adult. Poo poo is right H is not ready for Prime time, IMHO. But if someone disagrees i don't think either of us are asses. We just disagree.

:)
-Robby

Anonymous said...

Killing a high horse, Robby? Joan of Arc? lol. Hunter wrote a snarky, misinformed piece. That's OK. People called him an ass. That's OK too. Everybody knows H St. is coming along, but has, and will have, carry out places for a long time. And doo doo, you really should head to the burbs; it seems much more your style (what with the no chicken joints, etc.)

Alan Page said...

And it's silly to call the writer of an opinion piece a derogatory names

^ ^ isn't calling someone an ass an opinion? so i guess inked just wrote an opinion piece in response. LOL.

i do want to know what facts the writer got wrong though.

and robby...calling inked 'joan of arc' then asking her to stop the name calling is passive aggressive and illogical. be more consistent, please.

inked said...

Soul Searcher,
rereading the post what I mostly see is mischaracterizations. I thought the author said something about construction not have started on the Starburst Plaza, but unless he changed the wording it doesn't appear to quite say that. So I guess I'm complaining more about the tone.

Unknown said...

To Soul Searcher:

"Opinion pieces are reserved for less disciplined and less trained people like bloggers, columnists, and anyone else with an a-hole."

Listen, you can attack me if you want, but what I've written is truth. If there are matters of fact that were in correct lets discuss those, but why waste time calling someone an ass. Keeping one's eye on the ball, or dare I say on the prize, is the adult thing to do. It's what differentiated the fabled ant from the grasshopper.

As for calling Inked a name, well, I don't think it was that cut and dry, but lets not resort to name calling or falling on rhetorical swords. Some random guys article isn't really worth going back to grade school over.

Sometimes we have to show some dignity.

Sometimes we have to be adults. So yes, the high horse is dead.


Long live sobriety!

-Robby